2007 DODGE JOURNEY Recalls, Complaints & Safety

No recalls found for this vehicle.

Complaint Statistics

7 total complaints

Top Reported Components

Component	Complaints
ENGINE	2
VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL	1
ELECTRICAL SYSTEM	1
ELECTRICAL SYSTEM:HORN	1
SERVICE BRAKES	1
ELECTRONIC STABILITY CONTROL (ESC)	1

Incident date: Oct 12, 2015

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2003 (NA) DODGE JOURNEY. THE CONTACT RECEIVED NOTIFICATION OF NHTSA CAMPAIGN NUMBER: 15V675000 (ELECTRONIC STABILITY CONTROL, SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC); HOWEVER, THE PART TO DO THE REPAIR WAS UNAVAILABLE. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE MANUFACTURER EXCEEDED A REASONABLE AMOUNT O... Read more

Incident date: Oct 12, 2015

Incident date: Jul 1, 2015

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2007 DODGE JOURNEY. THE CONTACT'S VEHICLE WAS REPAIRED FOR THE WIRELESS IGNITION NODE MODULE AND THE ACCOUNT WAS CLOSED BY THE DEALER. SINCE THE RECALL REPAIR, THE HORN SELF-ACTIVATED AND SOUNDED FOR APPROXIMATELY 45 SECONDS. THE FAILURE RECURRED NUMEROUS TIMES. THE VEHICLE WA... Read more

Incident date: Jul 1, 2015

Incident date: Mar 16, 2015

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2007 DODGE JOURNEY. WHILE DRIVING AT 45 MPH, THE VEHICLE ACCELERATED WITHOUT WARNING AND CAUSED THE VEHICLE TO BECOME DIFFICULT TO REDUCE SPEED. THE FAILURE OCCURRED MULTIPLE TIMES. THE VEHICLE WAS NOT DIAGNOSED OR REPAIRED. THE MANUFACTURER WAS NOT NOTIFIED OF THE FAILURE. TH... Read more

Incident date: Mar 16, 2015

Incident date: Aug 22, 2012

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2007 DODGE JOURNEY. THE CONTACT STATED THAT WHILE ATTEMPTING TO START THE VEHICLE IT FAILED START. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO THE DEALER WHO STATED THAT THEY NEEDED TO REPLACE THE WIND MODULE. THE VEHICLE WAS REPAIRED BUT THE FAILURE RECURRED. THE MANUFACTURER WAS NOT CONTACTED.... Read more

NHTSA Safety Investigations — DODGE JOURNEY

Investigations opened by NHTSA into potential safety defects. These are separate from recalls and may or may not result in a recall.

EA — Open — Model Year: 2009

Vehicle entrapment

The Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) opened PE23-008 on May 1, 2023 to investigate an incident involving a 2009 Dodge Journey alleging occupant entrapment during a vehicle fire that resulted in a fatality. During the investigation, ODI collected information from the manufacturer and involved pa... Read more

PE — Closed — Model Year: 2019

Back up camera failure

On February 27, 2024, the Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) opened this Preliminary Evaluation (PE) to investigate complaints alleging a loss of back up camera function in Model Year (MY) 2018 through 2020 Dodge Journey vehicles.Â Complainants reported experiencing black screens, upside down ... Read more

RQ — Closed — Model Year: 2015

Stall from Crankshaft\Camshaft Failure

On December 13, 2016, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) received recall 16V-907 from Fiat Chrysler Automobiles (FCA) that identified a safety defect involving crankshaft or camshaft sensor failures on certain 2016 Model Year Dodge Journey, Jeep Compass, and Jeep Patriot vehi... cles. The failure of the crankshaft or camshaft sensor may lead to a loss of motive power (LOMP) in the recalled vehicles.Â Following the receipt of recall 16V-907, the Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) received 127 vehicle ownerâs questionnaires (VOQ), in which consumers allege experiencing crankshaft or camshaft failures on similar vehicles not included in the recall.Â On July 22, 2022, this Recall Query was opened to further assess the scope, frequency, and safety consequences of the alleged defect described in the recall. During this investigation, ODI sent two information request (IR) letters to FCA.Â The first letter was sent on August 15, 2022, and the second on July 12, 2024.Â Responses to these IR letters, that included manufacturer claim data related to the alleged defect, were received on September 26, 2022, and September 6, 2024, respectively. Analysis of ODI and FCA claim data identified two failure modes relating to intermittent crankshaft and camshaft sensor loss of signal.Â The first failure mode involves a faulty crankshaft or camshaft electrical connector, as identified in recall 16V-907. The second failure mode involves a faulty crankshaft and/or camshaft position sensor.Â Both failure modes exhibit intermittent operation of the crankshaft and/or camshaft position sensor that can result in a malfunction indicator lamp (MIL), engine stall while driving, or a no start condition. For the first failure mode, the claim data indicates that the majority of failures resulted in a LOMP and occurred on vehicles covered by recall 16V-907. For the second failure mode, the claim data indicates that the majority of failures resulted in a MIL or no start condition and occurred on vehicles manufactured prior to the vehicles covered by recall 16V-907. VOQ and claim data submitted to NHTSA, involving vehicles built outside the scope of recall 16V-907, commonly do not describe a LOMP. Â These claims typically describe experiencing symptoms such as a MIL, Diagnostic Trouble Code (DTC) associated with crank/camshaft position sensor, and subsequent visits to a dealership. A substantially smaller percentage of the complaints allege an actual LOMP ( During production, FCA implemented multiple corrective actions to address the camshaft/camshaft sensor signal issue. The last of which was a software update that occurred in February 2016 and based on the claim data, addressed the crankshaft and/or camshaft position sensor issues that were leading to MIL or no start.Â For vehicles built prior to the software update, the sensor failures were normally covered under warranty. FCAâs assessment of the alleged defect is that the subject vehicles (not included in recall 16V-907) are not typically experiencing a LOMP when they have trouble with their crankshaft and/or camshaft position sensor and for that reason it does not represent a safety defect. Â FCA states consumers experience multiple warning signs including MIL illumination, drive quality changes, or no start conditions when a crankshaft and/or camshaft position sensor is failing. Based on ODI's analysis of the failure modes, the failure mode for vehicles not included in recall 16V-907 is unlikely to result in LOMP. The data indicates that vehicles not included in the recall experience LOMP at much lower rates than the recalled population.Â In addition, ODI is not aware of any related vehicle crashes or injuries in that time.Â Given these facts, a safety-related defect trend has not been identified at this time. Â Accordingly, this investigation is closed without action. The closing of this investigation does not constitute a finding by NHTSA that a safety-related defect does not exist. The Agency reserves the right to take additional action if warranted by future circumstances. To review the ODI reports cited in the Closing Resume ODI Report Identification Number document, go to NHTSA.gov.Read more

Year	Recalls	Complaints
2020	1	77	View
2019	1	116	View
2018	9	328	View
2017	5	308	View
2016	6	598	View
2015	9	859	View
2014	10	635	View
2013	5	503	View
2012	7	621	View
2011	4	252	View
2010	4	1,475	View
2009	11	2,090	View
2008	0	12	View
2007 (current)	0	7

Model	Recalls	Complaints
DURANGO	234	19,190	View
CARAVAN	213	14,304	View
GRAND CARAVAN	203	18,754	View
CHARGER	200	8,152	View
RAM	176	5,521	View
DAKOTA	153	9,250	View
CHALLENGER	102	2,357	View
STRATUS	94	3,621	View

2007 DODGE JOURNEY

Complaint Statistics

Top Reported Components

NHTSA Safety Investigations — DODGE JOURNEY

DODGE JOURNEY — All Years Overview

DODGE JOURNEY — Year by Year

Other DODGE Models