Vehicle Safety
Recalls Search 320,000+ NHTSA safety recalls Complaints 2.1M+ consumer safety complaints TSBs 4.7M technical service bulletins VIN Lookup Decode any vehicle VIN instantly OBD Codes 12,000+ diagnostic trouble codes Fuel Economy EPA MPG data for all vehicles Statistics Recall trends & safety analysis
Consumer Safety
Product Safety 9,700+ CPSC product recalls Food Safety 28,600+ FDA food recalls Pet Safety 1.3M FDA animal adverse events Drug Safety 17,500+ FDA drug recalls Device Safety 38,400+ FDA device recalls Workplace Safety 102,900+ OSHA injury reports
Infrastructure
Bridge Safety 624,000 bridge inspections Aviation Safety 30,000+ NTSB aviation events Dam Safety 92,600 dam safety records Water Safety 433,000+ public water systems Railroad Safety 438,000+ rail crossings Pipeline Safety 8,800+ pipeline incidents
Public Health
Nursing Homes 14,700 CMS rated facilities Environmental 80,000+ hazardous sites & releases

LINDE

gas_transmission Incident —

Incident Information

Report Date—
OperatorLINDE
Commodity—
Pipeline Typegas_transmission

Location

State
Coordinates29.82693, -94.99458

Cause

CauseNATURAL FORCE DAMAGE
Subcause—

Casualties

Fatalities0
Injuries0

Costs

Property Damage—
Lost Commodity—
Public/Private Damage—
Emergency Response—
Environmental Remediation—
Other Costs—

Location Map

Incident Narrative

AT 1730 ON 5 MAY 2019, PRAXAIR WAS NOTIFIED BY A THIRD PARTY THAT THERE WAS A POSSIBLE LEAK ON ITS HYDROGEN PIPELINE, AS IDENTIFIED BY SOUND. PRAXAIR PERSONNEL ARRIVED ON THE SITE AT 1830 AND CONFIRMED THAT HYDROGEN WAS PRESENT IN THE AREA. THE LOCATION WAS IN AN ISOLATED AREA. MANUAL ISOLATION VALVES WERE SHUT TO CLOSE IN THE SEGMENT AND IT WAS MANUALLY BLOWN DOWN. AT 0852 ON 6 MAY 2019, PRAXAIR DETERMINED THAT THE INCIDENT MET REPORTABLE CRITERIA AND CALLED THE NATIONAL RESPONSE CENTER AT 0922. BLOWDOWN OF THE ISOLATED SEGMENT WAS COMPLETED AT 1230 ON 6 MAY 2019. THERE WAS NO IMMEDIATELY RECOGNIZABLE CAUSE OF THE INCIDENT. NO EXCAVATORS WERE OPERATING IN THE AREA, AND CP TESTING SHOWED NO ABNORMALITIES. THE SUSPECTED AREA OF THE LEAK WAS EXCAVATED, BUT THE PIPE WAS SHOWN TO BE IN EXCELLENT CONDITION. UPON FURTHER INVESTIGATION, IT WAS DETERMINED THAT THE LEAK WAS MOST LIKELY LOCATED UNDERNEATH A SMALL NON-NAVIGABLE DRAINAGE CANAL. UNABLE TO EXCAVATE UNDER THE WATER, A NEW SEGMENT OF PIPE WAS INSTALLED, REROUTING AROUND THE LEAK. THE PIPELINE WAS PUT BACK INTO SERVICE ON 12 MAY 2019 AT 0930. IN JUNE 2019, THE INACTIVE SEGMENT OF PIPE WAS FURTHER INVESTIGATED WITH A TETHERED INLINE INSPECTION (ILI) TOOL IN ORDER TO FURTHER INVESTIGATE THE CAUSE OF THE LEAK. RESULTS SHOWED AN ANOMALY IN THE VICINITY OF A GROUNDING ROD FOR A NEARBY ELECTRICAL TRANSMISSION TOWER. AN ADDITIONAL DCVG INSPECTION SHOWED A SIMILAR ANOMALY, CORRELATING THE RESULTS OF THE ILI. IT IS THEREFORE SUSPECTED THAT LIGHTNING STRUCK THE TOWER DURING A STORM, CREATING A SURGE OF ENERGY THAT RELEASED INTO THE GROUND THROUGH THE GROUNDING ROD. THIS ELECTRICAL ENERGY CREATED THE ANOMALY ON THE PIPE WHICH EVENTUALLY LED TO THE SMALL LEAK. THE NEWLY INSTALLED SEGMENT OF PIPE IS NOT LOCATED IN THE VICINITY OF THE GROUNDING ROD. AN EXTERNAL INSPECTION COMPANY WAS HIRED TO REVIEW PIPELINE LOCATIONS WITH SIMILAR ENVIRONMENTS THROUGHOUT THE PIPELINE SYSTEM. NO OTHER ANOMALIES WERE DISCOVERED AND A SIMILAR INCIDENT IS NOT SUSPECTED TO OCCUR AGAIN.

About This Pipeline Incident

Pipeline incident data is reported to the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA). All significant incidents involving fatalities, injuries, or property damage over $50,000 must be reported.

Browse All Incidents Pipeline Safety Stats Pipeline Safety Home
Back to All Incidents More Incidents in