Vehicle Safety
Recalls Search 320,000+ NHTSA safety recalls Complaints 2.1M+ consumer safety complaints TSBs 4.7M technical service bulletins VIN Lookup Decode any vehicle VIN instantly OBD Codes 12,000+ diagnostic trouble codes Fuel Economy EPA MPG data for all vehicles Safety Ratings 11,700+ NHTSA crash test ratings Investigations 5,300+ NHTSA defect investigations Statistics Recall trends & safety analysis
Consumer Safety
Product Safety 9,700+ CPSC product recalls Food Safety 28,600+ FDA food recalls Pet Safety 1.3M FDA animal adverse events Drug Safety 17,500+ FDA drug recalls Device Safety 38,400+ FDA device recalls Workplace Safety 102,900+ OSHA injury reports Brand History Cross-category recall lookup by company
Infrastructure
Bridge Safety 624,000 bridge inspections Aviation Safety 30,000+ NTSB aviation events Dam Safety 92,600 dam safety records Water Safety 433,000+ public water systems Railroad Safety 438,000+ rail crossings Pipeline Safety 8,800+ pipeline incidents State Safety Dashboards Safety grades for all 50 U.S. states ZIP Safety Report Check any 5-digit ZIP across 9 datasets
Public Health
Nursing Homes 14,700 CMS rated facilities Environmental 80,000+ hazardous sites & releases
Blog

Vehicle Safety

Vehicle Recalls320,000+ NHTSA safety recalls Browse VehiclesEvery make, model and year Complaints2.1M+ consumer safety complaints TSBs4.7M technical service bulletins VIN LookupDecode any vehicle VIN instantly OBD Codes12,000+ diagnostic trouble codes Fuel EconomyEPA MPG data for all vehicles Safety Ratings11,700+ NHTSA crash test ratings Investigations5,300+ NHTSA defect investigations StatisticsRecall trends & safety analysis Compare VehiclesTwo vehicles side by side

Consumer Safety

Product Safety9,700+ CPSC product recalls Food Safety28,600+ FDA food recalls Pet Safety1.3M FDA animal adverse events Drug Safety17,500+ FDA drug recalls Device Safety38,400+ FDA device recalls Workplace Safety102,900+ OSHA injury reports Brand HistoryRecall lookup by company

Infrastructure

Bridge Safety624,000 bridge inspections Aviation Safety30,000+ NTSB aviation events Dam Safety92,600 dam safety records Water Safety433,000+ public water systems Railroad Safety438,000+ rail crossings Pipeline Safety8,800+ pipeline incidents State DashboardsSafety grades for all 50 states ZIP ReportAny 5-digit ZIP across 9 datasets

Public Health

Nursing Homes14,700 CMS rated facilities Environmental80,000+ hazardous sites & releases BlogGuides, news & safety insights

Browse Dams

6,491 dams in the National Inventory of Dams.

National Inventory of Dams

Browse 6,491 dams from the NID database. Each record includes dam name, location, physical dimensions, hazard potential classification, condition assessment, purpose, owner information, and emergency action plan status. Use the filters below to search by state, hazard level, condition, or keyword.

Clear
Name State County Height (ft) Hazard Condition Year Purpose
Dam No 1 Kansas Jefferson 38 Low — 1954 Flood Risk Reduction
Glasgow Dam Kansas Jefferson 38 Low — 1976 Fire Protection, Stock, Or ...
Hawkins Dam Kansas Rawlins 38 High Poor 1967 Other
Frd No 10 (Spillman Creek) Kansas Lincoln 38 Low — — Flood Risk Reduction
Dd No 19 Kansas Brown 38 Low — 2006 Flood Risk Reduction
Kansas Doniphan 38 Low — 1970 Fire Protection, Stock, Or ...
Frd No 1 Kansas Harvey 38 High Satisfactory 1989 Flood Risk Reduction
Frd No 8 Kansas Chase 38 Low — 1965 Flood Risk Reduction
Frd No 17-36 Kansas Chautauqua 38 Low — 1965 Flood Risk Reduction
Kansas Chautauqua 38 Low — — Fire Protection, Stock, Or ...
Kansas Coffey 38 Low — 1979 Irrigation
Henry Stube Dd No Iii Kansas Brown 38 Low — — Flood Risk Reduction
Kansas Atchison 38 Low — — Fire Protection, Stock, Or ...
Frd No 17-5 Kansas Greenwood 38 Low — 1967 Flood Risk Reduction
Santa Fe Lake Dam Kansas Butler 38 High Poor 1927 Recreation
Frd No 22 Kansas Ness 37 Low — 1983 Flood Risk Reduction
Kansas Linn 37 Low — 1966 Fire Protection, Stock, Or ...
Cutting Lake Dam Kansas Norton 37 Low — 1937 Recreation
Frd No 21 Kansas Atchison 37 Significant Satisfactory 1965 Flood Risk Reduction
Frd No 3 Kansas Lyon 37 Low — 1988 Flood Risk Reduction
Kansas Brown 37 Low — 1970
Frd No 29 Kansas Chautauqua 37 Low — 1966 Flood Risk Reduction
Dd No I-4 Kansas Bourbon 37 Low — 2010 Flood Risk Reduction
Frd No B2-22 Kansas Chautauqua 37 Low — 1965 Flood Risk Reduction
Frd No 18 Kansas Osage 37 Low — 1974 Flood Risk Reduction
Kansas Osborne 37 Low — 1970 Fire Protection, Stock, Or ...
Frd No 3-19 Kansas Chautauqua 37 Low — 1967 Flood Risk Reduction
Kansas Morris 37 Low — — Fire Protection, Stock, Or ...
Frd No 6-7 Kansas Lyon 37 Low — 1966 Flood Risk Reduction
Frd No 70 Kansas Marshall 37 Low — 1976 Flood Risk Reduction
C-134 Kansas Jackson 37 Low — — Flood Risk Reduction
Kansas Doniphan 37 Low — 1972 Fire Protection, Stock, Or ...
Frd No 19 Kansas Cowley 37 Low — 1967 Flood Risk Reduction
Dd No 1-1a Kansas Bourbon 37 Low — 1995 Flood Risk Reduction
Dd No G-3 (Merrill) Kansas Anderson 37 Low Satisfactory — Flood Risk Reduction
Kansas Doniphan 37 Low — 1971 Fire Protection, Stock, Or ...
Dd No 10 (Krouse) Kansas Pottawatomie 37 Low — — Flood Risk Reduction
Lake Mckinney Dam Kansas Kearny 37 High Fair 1890
Frd No 38 Kansas Elk 37 Low — 1965 Flood Risk Reduction
Kansas Cowley 37 Low — 1974 Fire Protection, Stock, Or ...
Gs Dd No D-15 (Johnson) Kansas Jackson 37 Significant Satisfactory 1982 Flood Risk Reduction
Frd No 4 Kansas Chase 37 Significant Poor 1965 Flood Risk Reduction
Kansas Jefferson 37 Low — 1971
Frd No 38 Kansas Ness 37 High Fair 1985 Flood Risk Reduction
Frd No Gs 3a Kansas Brown 37 Low — 1968 Flood Risk Reduction
Kansas Atchison 37 Low — — Fire Protection, Stock, Or ...
Frd No 3 (Nebo Creek) Kansas Jackson 37 Low — 1999 Flood Risk Reduction
Spring Hill Water Supply Dam Kansas Johnson 37 High Poor 1953 Water Supply
Frd No 35 Kansas Elk 37 Low — 1968 Flood Risk Reduction
Frd No 37 Kansas Ness 37 Low — 1989 Flood Risk Reduction

Frequently Asked Questions

Hazard potential is based on the consequences of dam failure, not the condition of the dam. High hazard means loss of human life is probable. Significant means economic and environmental losses are expected but no probable loss of life. Low means minimal losses are expected. The classification considers downstream population, infrastructure, and environmental resources.

Condition ratings reflect the physical state of the dam based on periodic inspections. Satisfactory means no deficiencies found. Fair means minor issues exist but no immediate action needed. Poor means safety deficiencies require remedial action. Unsatisfactory means the dam is unsafe and immediate corrective action is required.

Yes. Use the search field above to find dams by name. You can also combine the search with state, hazard, and condition filters to narrow your results. Each dam record links to a detail page with complete information.