Vehicle Safety
Recalls Search 320,000+ NHTSA safety recalls Complaints 2.1M+ consumer safety complaints TSBs 4.7M technical service bulletins VIN Lookup Decode any vehicle VIN instantly OBD Codes 12,000+ diagnostic trouble codes Fuel Economy EPA MPG data for all vehicles Safety Ratings 11,700+ NHTSA crash test ratings Investigations 5,300+ NHTSA defect investigations Statistics Recall trends & safety analysis
Consumer Safety
Product Safety 9,700+ CPSC product recalls Food Safety 28,600+ FDA food recalls Pet Safety 1.3M FDA animal adverse events Drug Safety 17,500+ FDA drug recalls Device Safety 38,400+ FDA device recalls Workplace Safety 102,900+ OSHA injury reports Brand History Cross-category recall lookup by company
Infrastructure
Bridge Safety 624,000 bridge inspections Aviation Safety 30,000+ NTSB aviation events Dam Safety 92,600 dam safety records Water Safety 433,000+ public water systems Railroad Safety 438,000+ rail crossings Pipeline Safety 8,800+ pipeline incidents State Safety Dashboards Safety grades for all 50 U.S. states ZIP Safety Report Check any 5-digit ZIP across 9 datasets
Public Health
Nursing Homes 14,700 CMS rated facilities Environmental 80,000+ hazardous sites & releases
Blog

Vehicle Safety

Vehicle Recalls320,000+ NHTSA safety recalls Browse VehiclesEvery make, model and year Complaints2.1M+ consumer safety complaints TSBs4.7M technical service bulletins VIN LookupDecode any vehicle VIN instantly OBD Codes12,000+ diagnostic trouble codes Fuel EconomyEPA MPG data for all vehicles Safety Ratings11,700+ NHTSA crash test ratings Investigations5,300+ NHTSA defect investigations StatisticsRecall trends & safety analysis Compare VehiclesTwo vehicles side by side

Consumer Safety

Product Safety9,700+ CPSC product recalls Food Safety28,600+ FDA food recalls Pet Safety1.3M FDA animal adverse events Drug Safety17,500+ FDA drug recalls Device Safety38,400+ FDA device recalls Workplace Safety102,900+ OSHA injury reports Brand HistoryRecall lookup by company

Infrastructure

Bridge Safety624,000 bridge inspections Aviation Safety30,000+ NTSB aviation events Dam Safety92,600 dam safety records Water Safety433,000+ public water systems Railroad Safety438,000+ rail crossings Pipeline Safety8,800+ pipeline incidents State DashboardsSafety grades for all 50 states ZIP ReportAny 5-digit ZIP across 9 datasets

Public Health

Nursing Homes14,700 CMS rated facilities Environmental80,000+ hazardous sites & releases BlogGuides, news & safety insights

Browse Dams

6,491 dams in the National Inventory of Dams.

National Inventory of Dams

Browse 6,491 dams from the NID database. Each record includes dam name, location, physical dimensions, hazard potential classification, condition assessment, purpose, owner information, and emergency action plan status. Use the filters below to search by state, hazard level, condition, or keyword.

Clear
Name State County Height (ft) Hazard Condition Year Purpose
Frd No Gs 23 Kansas Brown 39 Low — 1963 Flood Risk Reduction
Frd No 17-3 Kansas Chautauqua 39 Low — 1965 Flood Risk Reduction
Frd No 5 Kansas Chase 39 Low Fair 1965 Flood Risk Reduction
Dd No E-5 Kansas Bourbon 39 Low — — Flood Risk Reduction
111 Kansas Wabaunsee 39 Low Satisfactory — Flood Risk Reduction
Frd No 3 Kansas Chase 39 Low — 1965 Flood Risk Reduction
Kansas Doniphan 39 Low — 1974 Debris Control
Frd No 2 Kansas Kearny 39 High Satisfactory 1968 Flood Risk Reduction
Frd No 1 Kansas Elk 39 Low — 1979 Flood Risk Reduction
Barton County Club Dam Kansas Barton 39 High — 1922 Recreation
Frd No 1 Kansas Morris 39 High Satisfactory 1977 Flood Risk Reduction
Frd No T-1 Kansas Brown 39 Significant Poor 1968 Flood Risk Reduction
Frd No 2 Kansas Dickinson 39 Low — 1973 Flood Risk Reduction
Gs Dd No D-39 Kansas Jackson 39 Low — — Flood Risk Reduction
Gs Dd No 3-18 Kansas Jackson 39 Low — 1990 Debris Control
Gs Dd 31-13 Kansas Nemaha 39 Significant — 1992 Flood Risk Reduction
Dd No 18-8 Kansas Brown 39 Significant Fair 1999 Debris Control
Cedar Lake (Old Olathe Lake) Kansas Johnson 39 High Poor 1931 Water Supply
Gassaway Dam Kansas Ellis 39 Low — 1963
Dd No 103 Kansas Douglas 39 Low — 1997 Flood Risk Reduction
Kansas Jefferson 39 Low — 1971
Frd No 17 Kansas Butler 39 Low — 1969 Flood Risk Reduction
Gs Dd No 8-2 Kansas Brown 39 Low — 1990 Debris Control
Paradise Lake Kansas Atchison 39 Low — — Fire Protection, Stock, Or ...
Frd No 5 Kansas Dickinson 39 Low — 1971 Flood Risk Reduction
Mtm 1 Kansas Neosho 39 Low — 1995 Fire Protection, Stock, Or ...
Kansas Chautauqua 39 Low — 1977 Fire Protection, Stock, Or ...
Frd No 9-1 Kansas Greenwood 39 Low — 1964 Flood Risk Reduction
Kansas Leavenworth 38 Low — 1938 Fire Protection, Stock, Or ...
Kansas Butler 38 Low — — Fire Protection, Stock, Or ...
Frd No 57 Kansas Marshall 38 Low — 1971 Flood Risk Reduction
Dd No 143 Kansas Ness 38 Low — 1975 Flood Risk Reduction
Frd No 27 Kansas Marshall 38 Low — 1974 Flood Risk Reduction
Hawkins Dam Kansas Rawlins 38 High Poor 1967 Other
Henry Stube Dd No Iii Kansas Brown 38 Low — — Flood Risk Reduction
Kansas Johnson 38 Low — — Irrigation
Kansas Doniphan 38 Low — 1969 Flood Risk Reduction
Dd No 4-14a Kansas Hodgeman 38 High Poor — Flood Risk Reduction
Dam No 1 Kansas Jefferson 38 Low — 1954 Flood Risk Reduction
Kansas Doniphan 38 Low — — Debris Control
Gs Dd No C-88 (Gs-28a) Kansas Jackson 38 Low — — Flood Risk Reduction
Dd No C-56 (King) Kansas Jackson 38 Low — 1978 Flood Risk Reduction
Kansas Doniphan 38 Low — 1970 Fire Protection, Stock, Or ...
Kansas Wyandotte 38 Low — — Fire Protection, Stock, Or ...
Dd No 5 Kansas Woodson 38 Low — 1986 Flood Risk Reduction
Frd No 7 Kansas Coffey 38 Low — 1991 Flood Risk Reduction
Gs Dd No B-69 Kansas Atchison 38 Low — 1994 Debris Control
Frd No 1 Kansas Harvey 38 High Satisfactory 1989 Flood Risk Reduction
Gs Dd No 2-26 Kansas Brown 38 Low — 1995 Debris Control
Antelope Lake Kansas Graham 38 Low — 1996 Recreation

Frequently Asked Questions

Hazard potential is based on the consequences of dam failure, not the condition of the dam. High hazard means loss of human life is probable. Significant means economic and environmental losses are expected but no probable loss of life. Low means minimal losses are expected. The classification considers downstream population, infrastructure, and environmental resources.

Condition ratings reflect the physical state of the dam based on periodic inspections. Satisfactory means no deficiencies found. Fair means minor issues exist but no immediate action needed. Poor means safety deficiencies require remedial action. Unsatisfactory means the dam is unsafe and immediate corrective action is required.

Yes. Use the search field above to find dams by name. You can also combine the search with state, hazard, and condition filters to narrow your results. Each dam record links to a detail page with complete information.