Browse Dams

11,361 dams in the National Inventory of Dams.

National Inventory of Dams

Browse 11,361 dams from the NID database. Each record includes dam name, location, physical dimensions, hazard potential classification, condition assessment, purpose, owner information, and emergency action plan status. Use the filters below to search by state, hazard level, condition, or keyword.

Clear
Name State County Height (ft) Hazard Condition Year Purpose
Town of Altamont Utah Duchesne 18 Significant Not Rated — Irrigation
Leslie Heifner Florida Citrus 18 Significant Not Rated 1967 Flood Risk Reduction
Covalt Dam Nebraska Morrill 18 Significant Satisfactory 1964 Flood Risk Reduction
Structure 353 Florida Citrus 18 Significant Not Rated 1962 Flood Risk Reduction
Burns Dam Tennessee Bledsoe 18 Significant — 1955
Katherine Allison Dam Alabama Sumter 18 Significant Not Rated 1965 Recreation
Terry Lake Dam Texas Brazos 18 Significant Not Rated 2004 Debris Control
Baker Lake Dam Arkansas Searcy 18 Significant Not Rated 1958 Recreation
Far A Way Dam Tennessee Sevier 18 Significant — 2006 Fire Protection, Stock, Or ...
Maurice Bryant Lake Dam Indiana Hendricks 18 Significant Not Rated 1945 Recreation
Bone Lake Dam Alabama Perry 18 Significant Not Rated 1950 Recreation
Kansas Brown 18 Significant Not Rated — Irrigation
Tarum #2 Montana Valley 18 Significant — 1952 Irrigation
Weston Wyoming Sheridan 18 Significant Poor 1913 Irrigation
A. G. Smith Dam North Carolina Jackson 18 Significant — — Recreation
Lower Sabino Dam Arizona Pima 18 Significant Not Rated 1935
Jack Hardenbergh Dam Alabama Hale 18 Significant Not Rated 1968 Recreation
Robinson Lake Dam Arkansas Cross 18 Significant Not Rated 1962 Recreation
Magleby Utah Sevier 18 Significant Not Rated 1915 Irrigation
Gilbert Tommie Lake Dam Alabama Tuscaloosa 18 Significant Not Rated 1954 Recreation
Browns Lake Dam Arkansas Saline 18 Significant Not Rated 1969 Recreation
P-7 Florida Polk 18 Significant Not Rated 1965 Flood Risk Reduction
Dr. Mok Lake Dam Indiana Vanderburgh 18 Significant Not Rated — Recreation
Clear Springs Marina Florida Polk 18 Significant Not Rated 1956 Tailings
Crouchwood Lake Dam Arkansas Hot Spring 18 Significant Not Rated 1970 Recreation
Arnoname 4 Dougherty'S Dam Arkansas Lonoke 18 Significant Not Rated 1942 Recreation
West Hill Mine Pit Minnesota Koochiching 18 Significant Poor — Tailings
Industries Drive Dam Massachusetts Norfolk 18 Significant Poor —
Landmark Lake Dam Arkansas Pulaski 18 Significant Not Rated 1957 Flood Risk Reduction
Hoskins Dam Tennessee Bradley 18 Significant — 1965
Murray Wisconsin Price 18 Significant Satisfactory 1880 Recreation
Sunnybrook Dam North Carolina Wake 18 Significant Poor — Debris Control
Castle Lake Utah Summit 18 Significant Not Rated — Irrigation
Hansen Idaho Latah 18 Significant Satisfactory 1976 Other
Hidden Vally Lake Dam Arkansas Cross 18 Significant Not Rated 1964 Recreation
Silvermine Dam Connecticut Fairfield 18 Significant Fair — Recreation
Choctaw Lake Dam Arkansas Van Buren 18 Significant Not Rated 1953 Recreation
Berthoud Colorado Larimer 18 Significant Satisfactory 1962 Water Supply
Grantsville Regulating Pond Utah Tooele 18 Significant Not Rated 1986 Other
Settling Area No 1 Florida Polk 18 Significant Not Rated 1962 Tailings
Mossy Pond Dam Massachusetts Worcester 18 Significant Poor 1876 Recreation
Johnson Pond Dam Alabama Blount 18 Significant Not Rated 1958 Recreation
Spirit Lake Utah Daggett 18 Significant Not Rated 1934 Irrigation
Rohr Dam Ohio Carroll 18 Significant Fair 1973 Water Supply
Knutson Dam 8148 Nebraska Furnas 18 Significant Fair 1960 Fire Protection, Stock, Or ...
Eastman Treatment Lagoons Dam New Hampshire Sullivan 18 Significant Not Rated — Flood Risk Reduction
Torger Dam Montana Petroleum 18 Significant — 1976 Irrigation
Litvak Dam Florida Escambia 18 Significant Not Rated 1970 Recreation
Kansas Phillips 18 Significant — — Fire Protection, Stock, Or ...
Meadow Lodge Lake Utah Iron 18 Significant Not Rated 1965 Recreation

Frequently Asked Questions

Hazard potential is based on the consequences of dam failure, not the condition of the dam. High hazard means loss of human life is probable. Significant means economic and environmental losses are expected but no probable loss of life. Low means minimal losses are expected. The classification considers downstream population, infrastructure, and environmental resources.

Condition ratings reflect the physical state of the dam based on periodic inspections. Satisfactory means no deficiencies found. Fair means minor issues exist but no immediate action needed. Poor means safety deficiencies require remedial action. Unsatisfactory means the dam is unsafe and immediate corrective action is required.

Yes. Use the search field above to find dams by name. You can also combine the search with state, hazard, and condition filters to narrow your results. Each dam record links to a detail page with complete information.