Browse Dams

7,712 dams in the National Inventory of Dams.

National Inventory of Dams

Browse 7,712 dams from the NID database. Each record includes dam name, location, physical dimensions, hazard potential classification, condition assessment, purpose, owner information, and emergency action plan status. Use the filters below to search by state, hazard level, condition, or keyword.

Clear
Name State County Height (ft) Hazard Condition Year Purpose
Lake Mcneely Dam Kentucky Jefferson 32 Significant Poor 1953 Recreation
George Wike Dam South Carolina Greenville 32 Low Poor 1995 Fish and Wildlife Pond
Batesburg Reservoir Dam South Carolina Lexington 32 High Poor 1935 Recreation
Dam 47 Texas Bell 32 High Poor 1968 Flood Risk Reduction
Ryan-Lindell Minnesota Goodhue 32 Low Poor 1984 Flood Risk Reduction
Port Hudson Lake No 4 Louisiana East Baton Rouge 32 Low Poor — Recreation
Lake Corsica Dam South Dakota Douglas 32 High Poor 1939 Recreation
Dam No 4 Kansas Linn 32 High Poor — Recreation
Carolina Orchard Dam 2 South Carolina Cherokee 32 Low Poor 1970 Irrigation
Lawsons Farm Lake West Virginia Roane 32 Significant Poor 1970 Recreation
Halley Pond Dam Ohio Morgan 32 Significant Poor 1959 Recreation
Rocky Comfort W/S Str. # 50 Georgia Warren 32 High Poor 1968
Weir Club Dam South Carolina Newberry 32 Low Poor 1960 Recreation
Canary Grove Livestock Reservoir Wyoming Carbon 32 Low Poor 1999 Fire Protection, Stock, Or ...
Lake Grant Dam Ohio Brown 32 High Poor 1948 Recreation
Koehler Dam New Mexico Colfax 32 Low Poor 1911 Irrigation
Kappelman Dam Nebraska Keya Paha 32 Low Poor 1964 Irrigation
Ruckers Pond Dam South Carolina Calhoun 32 Low Poor 1900 Recreation
Van Bruggen Reservoir Dam New Mexico Colfax 32 Low Poor 1904 Irrigation
Di-Or Lake Dam Ohio Jackson 32 Significant Poor 1972 Recreation
La Barge Michigan Kent 32 High Poor 1901 Hydroelectric
Pine Log Tributary Watershed Structure No. 21 Georgia Bartow 32 High Poor 1969 Flood Risk Reduction
Reformatory Dam Kentucky Oldham 32 Low Poor 1955 Other
Halfpint Detention Dam Montana Valley 32 Low Poor 1965 Flood Risk Reduction
Clark Lake Dam South Carolina Richland 32 High Poor 1965 Irrigation
Richardson Dam 433 Nebraska Keya Paha 32 Low Poor 1955 Irrigation
Waugh Dam Louisiana Lincoln 32 Low Poor 1950 Recreation
Watson Lake Dam North Carolina Lee 32 High Poor 1956 Water Supply
Tinemaha California Inyo 32 High Poor 1928 Other
Barnesville Lake Dam Ohio Belmont 32 High Poor 1969 Recreation
Buck Draw Wyoming Carbon 32 Low Poor 1955 Irrigation
Darrah No. 2 Wyoming Park 32 Low Poor 1914 Irrigation
Little River W/S Str. #39 Dam Georgia Fulton 32 High Poor 1953 Flood Risk Reduction
Howard Robertson Dam New Mexico Union 32 Low Poor 1974 Flood Risk Reduction
Wilson Creek 1-24 Nebraska Otoe 32 Low Poor 1968 Other
Ursula Dam South Carolina Edgefield 32 Low Poor 1991 Other
Koranda Dam Nebraska Saunders 32 Low Poor 1960 Other
Dd No 107 Kansas Harvey 32 High Poor 2000 Flood Risk Reduction
Second Reservoir Dam New York Rockland 32 Significant Poor 1928 Water Supply
Poinsett Wid Site 1 Arkansas Poinsett 32 High Poor 1976 Flood Risk Reduction
Peterson Dam Nebraska Keya Paha 32 Low Poor 1977 Irrigation
Clark Seed Farms Pond Dam #3 New York Tioga 32 Significant Poor 1964 Irrigation
Gilbert-Stukenholtz Dam Nebraska Nemaha 32 Low Poor 1980 Other
Pumpkinvine Creek W/S Str. #26 Georgia Paulding 32 High Poor 1958 Flood Risk Reduction
Said Vermont Rutland 32 Low Poor 1968 Recreation
Hidden Hill Lake Dam Ohio Clermont 32 Low Poor 1943 Recreation
Stewart Creek FRS No 2 Kentucky Hopkins 32 High Poor 1987 Flood Risk Reduction
Emergency Storage Basin Dam South Carolina Greenville 32 Low Poor 2000 Other
Cedar Lake Dam No.2 West Virginia Jackson 32 Significant Poor 1952 Recreation
Hirsig No. 4 Wyoming Laramie 32 Low Poor 1974 Fish and Wildlife Pond

Frequently Asked Questions

Hazard potential is based on the consequences of dam failure, not the condition of the dam. High hazard means loss of human life is probable. Significant means economic and environmental losses are expected but no probable loss of life. Low means minimal losses are expected. The classification considers downstream population, infrastructure, and environmental resources.

Condition ratings reflect the physical state of the dam based on periodic inspections. Satisfactory means no deficiencies found. Fair means minor issues exist but no immediate action needed. Poor means safety deficiencies require remedial action. Unsatisfactory means the dam is unsafe and immediate corrective action is required.

Yes. Use the search field above to find dams by name. You can also combine the search with state, hazard, and condition filters to narrow your results. Each dam record links to a detail page with complete information.