Consumer Safety Complaints

Search 2,245,377 safety complaints filed by vehicle owners with NHTSA, including 140,173 crashes, 56,794 fires, and 8,580 deaths.

2,245,377 Total Complaints
140,173 Reported Crashes
56,794 Reported Fires
8,580 Reported Deaths

What is a NHTSA consumer complaint?

A consumer complaint is a free-form report filed by a vehicle owner directly to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) describing a safety concern about their vehicle. NHTSA collects these reports through its Vehicle Owner Defect Report (VOQ) system and publishes them publicly. Each complaint includes the affected component, the date and circumstances of the incident, whether the failure caused a crash or fire, and any reported injuries or deaths. The owner's full narrative description is included verbatim, NHTSA does not edit or moderate the descriptions.

The database below contains over 2,245,377 individual complaints. NHTSA's investigators monitor it for clusters of similar reports, when enough owners describe the same failure mode on the same vehicle, NHTSA may open a Preliminary Evaluation that can lead to a recall. Many of the largest recalls in U.S. history, including the Takata airbag recall and the Hyundai/Kia engine fire recalls, started as patterns visible in this complaint database years before they became formal recalls.

How to interpret what you read

A few principles for reading consumer complaints usefully:

  • One complaint is anecdote; a hundred similar complaints is data. NHTSA does not investigate the truthfulness of any individual report, that's the job of the Office of Defects Investigation, which looks at the full pattern. When evaluating a vehicle, look for whether multiple owners describe the same chain of events.
  • Crash, fire, injury, and death flags are owner-set. They are not verified by NHTSA. They are still useful as a filter, because owners who tick those boxes are typically reporting more serious incidents than those who don't.
  • Component categories are NHTSA-assigned, not owner-assigned. NHTSA standardizes the component field so that complaints can be aggregated. The owner narrative often goes into more detail than the component category captures.
  • Complaint volume scales with sales volume. A best-selling model will accumulate more raw complaints than a niche model even at the same defect rate. To compare across vehicles, look at complaints per 100,000 units sold, not raw counts.

If you've experienced a defect

File a complaint. NHTSA's investigators rely on this database to detect emerging defects, and useful complaints, specific, concrete, with dates and mileage and clear descriptions of what happened, feed directly into the agency's pattern detection. The form takes about 10 minutes and is at nhtsa.gov/recalls under "Report a Safety Problem." Your complaint becomes part of the same public record that this page is built from. Owners filing detailed VOQs are how recalls get triggered.

Read more from our blog

How to Read NHTSA Consumer Complaints › How NHTSA Investigations Work › Used Car: 7 Recall Checks to Run First › The Takata Airbag Recall: Full Story › OBD-II Codes Explained › All Articles ›
Clear

Showing 1,762 complaints for WINNEBAGO

WINNEBAGO WINNEBAGO (1994) - LATCHES/LOCKS/LINKAGES:DOORS:LATCH May 11, 1995
Incident date: Jun 24, 1994
ENTRANCE DOOR POPS OPEN/ NEEDS ADJUSTMENT TO THE LATCH. *AK
2 injured
WINNEBAGO WINNEBAGO (1994) - SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC:FOUNDATION COMPONENTS May 9, 1995
BRAKES ARE FAILING, EXCESSIVE HEAT PRODUCED BY BRAKES, INVOLVE IN RECALL 93V146000. TT
WINNEBAGO WINNEBAGO (1993) - STRUCTURE:FRAME AND MEMBERS Apr 5, 1995
Incident date: Jan 1, 1995
MOTORHOME TOO HEAVY ON RIGHT SIDE, CAUSING HOME TO TILT TO ONE SIDE AND APPLY TOO MUCH WEIGHT ON FRONT RIGHT TIRE. TT
WINNEBAGO WINNEBAGO (1993) - VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL Feb 27, 1995
Incident date: Feb 27, 1995
CRUISE CONTROL FAILS TO DISENGAGED CAUSING CONTINUOUS DRIVING, GOING TO HIGHER SPEEDS, SUDDEN ACCELERATION. HAVE TO SHIFT GEARS INTO NEUTRAL TO STOP VEHICLE.
WINNEBAGO WINNEBAGO (1993) - SUSPENSION:FRONT Feb 22, 1995
Incident date: Dec 5, 1994
MOTOR CITY FORD TRUCK 93V052. DEALERSHIP REFUSED TO HONOR THE RECALL BECAUSE IT WAS OVERWEIGHT AND COULD DAMAGE THE FRONT AXLE. TT `
WINNEBAGO SUN CRUISER (1995) - VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL Feb 16, 1995
Incident date: Feb 12, 1995
WHEN IN HIGH ALTITUDES, THE ENGINE WILL NOT DECELERATE TO AN IDLE POSITION. TT
WINNEBAGO CHIEFTAN (1992) - SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC:POWER ASSIST:VACUUM Feb 2, 1995
Incident date: Aug 20, 1992
BRAKE PEDAL WENT TO THE FLOOR, WHEN FIXED BRAKES LAST FOR 20 TO 500 MILES AND THEN FADE AGAIN, REPLACE POWER STEERING AND BRAKE UNIT/BOOSTER 5 TIMES. TT
WINNEBAGO CHIEFTAN (1992) - STEERING:HYDRAULIC POWER ASSIST SYSTEM Feb 2, 1995
Incident date: Aug 20, 1992
BRAKE PEDAL WENT TO THE FLOOR, WHEN FIXED BRAKES LAST FOR 20 TO 500 MILES AND THEN FADE AGAIN, REPLACE POWER STEERING AND BRAKE UNIT/BOOSTER 5 TIMES. TT
WINNEBAGO WINNEBAGO (1994) - SERVICE BRAKES, AIR Jan 25, 1995
Incident date: Oct 20, 1994
AIR BRAKE SYSTEM FAILED TWICE ON FLAT SURFACE. TT
WINNEBAGO WINNEBAGO (1994) - STEERING:COLUMN LOCKING:ANTI-THEFT DEVICE Jan 25, 1995
Incident date: Oct 20, 1994
ANTI-THEFT ALARM SYSTEM FAILED 3 TIMES. *AK
WINNEBAGO WINNEBAGO (1994) - STEERING: STEERING WHEEL/HANDLE BAR Jan 23, 1995
Incident date: Aug 30, 1994
P 3O CHASSIS/CHEVROLET: STEERING VERY LOOSE, UNSAFE DRIVING, COULD CAUSE AN ACCIDENT. TT
WINNEBAGO WINNEBAGO (1994) - SUSPENSION:FRONT:CONTROL ARM:UPPER ARM Jan 23, 1995
Incident date: Aug 30, 1994
VEHICLE HAS A TENDENCY TO WANDER AND WHEN PASSED BY A TRUCK GOING IN OPPOSITE DIRECTION, TO VEER TO THE RIGHT. *AK
Previous 1 2 3 4 5 ... 35 36